²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø

²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø defends 2020 Title IX regs

Legislative Policy Priorities

Title IX Regulations

FIRE fights back against lawsuits challenging 2020 Title IX regulations

On May 6, 2020, the Department of Education issued Title IX regulations requiring educational institutions to use the Supreme Court’s definition of student-on-student sexual harassment and to provide students important procedural safeguards during Title IX disciplinary processes. The regulations took effect August 14, 2020.

After their enactment, an array of organizations and attorneys general filed five lawsuits challenging the legality of the new Title IX regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act and the U.S. Constitution. These lawsuits claim that the Department did not follow APA procedures in enacting the regulations, and further allege that the regulations are not in accordance with law, exceed the Department of Education’s authority, are arbitrary and capricious, and violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment. ²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø disagrees.

FIRE therefore moved to intervene as defendants in all five cases in order to defend the critical protections for students’ rights contained in the regulations as not merely good policy choices, but as constitutional requirements. One of ²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø’s motions has been granted, while another was denied on the merits. (The remaining three were denied as moot, since the plaintiffs’ cases were dismissed.)

The contradicting rulings on two of ²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø’s motions to intervene are due to a split among the federal courts of appeal regarding whether courts must presume that the government will adequately represent the interests of would-be intervenors (such as ²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø). This question is particularly pertinent given the Biden Administration’s expressed opposition to the existing regulations. The differing outcomes in virtually identical cases illustrate why the Supreme Court should grant ²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵAPP¹ÙÍø’s petition for a writ of certiorari to resolve this important question.

Cases  

Active Cases

Victim Rights Law Center, et al. v. Cardona, et al. (1st Cir.)

Pennsylvania et al. v. DeVos

The Women’s Student Union v. U.S. Department of Education

Closed Cases

New York v. Department of Education

Know Your IX et al. v. DeVos

Victim Rights Law Center, et al. v. Cardona, et al. (S. Ct.)

Share