Table of Contents
Defend dissent! — FAN 331
Marina Ovsyannikova's anti-war protest during a Russian state television network's live broadcast.
FAN is on spring break and will return next week. In the meantime, here is the full “Academic Speech — Protected or Perilous?” series:
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “ACLU’s David Cole Weighs in on Georgetown University Law School Controversy. Commentaries to Follow”
- Erwin Chemerinsky, “The Role of Deans and Administrators in Dealing with Offensive Speech”
- Nadine Strossen, “Some Thoughts About University Officials’ ‘Counter-Speech’”
- Burt Neuborne, “Sticks and Stones”
- Ira Glasser, “Social Justice Requires Free Speech”
- John K. Wilson, “How Suspensions Violate Academic Freedom”
- Ronald K. L. Collins, “Georgetown’s Free Speech Experiment: What’s Next?”
- Emerson Sykes, "Academic Freedom for Whom?”
Related
- Nate Hochman, ",” National Review (March 2)
Last scheduled FAN
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
POLL: Conservatives more optimistic, liberals more concerned about free speech in 2025
Conservatives went from the most pessimistic subgroup to the most optimistic following Donald Trump’s election, while liberals’ optimism fell.
Her grad school tried to expel her for a tweet about Cardi B. Now they’ll pay a $250K lawsuit settlement
Kim Diei's settlement is a warning to colleges around the country: If you police students’ personal online expression, there will be consequences.
ݮƵAPP kicks off legislative season by opposing speech-restrictive AI bill
Legislators in the state of Washington have proposed a bill that would require a disclosure on any AI-generated content.
Politics determines whether Americans believe their free speech rights will be protected
ݮƵAPP’s fifth installment of the National Speech Index survey reveals a partisan divide in the security of freedom of speech and the direction it is headed in America.